WebTURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 2 Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Turkey. 4. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. I. BACKGROUND TO THE CASE A. Attempted coup of 15 July 2016 and declaration of a state of WebTAŞKIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 3 would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1. 6. On 1 November 2001 the …

AFFAIRE SAKIK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE C O U R E U R O P É E …

WebISSA v. TURKEY 156 ILR 1 3 there any independent eyewitness account of the presence of soldiers in that area or of the detention of the shepherds. It could not be determined … WebTANI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Tanış and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Sir … if we the flight yesterday

rm.coe.int

WebFeb 24, 2010 · (Mar. 1, 2010) On February 23, 2010, in Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Turkey had violated article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience, and religion) of the … WebCASE OF DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2004 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 Websurvived by virtue of Turkish military and other support. Turkey, therefore, had jurisdiction under the Convention. Andreas Manitaras and Others v. Turkey (no. 54591/00) 3 June 2008 Following the Turkish intervention of 1974 in the north of Cyprus, Ioannis Manitaras remained living together with a small group of Greek Cypriots. In February 1998, he is tapatio hot